Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
Coventry City Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 149 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

BANNER LANE NO.1

reference
0234/T015
name
BANNER LANE NO.1
tree-preservation-order

undefined

0234
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.597588 52.406654)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.597507 52.406653,-1.597511 52.406669,-1.597522 52.406683,-1.597532 52.406690,-1.597548 52.406698,-1.597577 52.406704,-1.597602 52.406704,-1.597626 52.406699,-1.597646 52.406689,-1.597661 52.406677,-1.597665 52.406671,-1.597669 52.406658,-1.597668 52.406643,-1.597659 52.406628,-1.597650 52.406620,-1.597631 52.406610,-1.597603 52.406603,-1.597568 52.406604,-1.597558 52.406606,-1.597537 52.406614,-1.597526 52.406621,-1.597515 52.406632,-1.597510 52.406641,-1.597507 52.406653)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-14
start-date
1999-02-12
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The Tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

How to improve Coventry City Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL