Your data has issues
There is a problem
- 2 entries with tree-protection-order field must match the reference field in the tree protection order
| Reference | Name | Tree preservation order | Uprn | Address text | Point | Geometry | Notes | Organisation | Felled date | Entry date | Start date | End date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPO 17/99 (a) - T1 | Maple (Acer) |
TPO 17/99 (a) Missing associated entity |
35 Daws Heath Road, Hadleigh, Benfleet, SS7 3UT | POINT (0.597353 51.569607) | 1999-12-02 | 1999-12-02 | ||||||
| TPO 17/99 (a) - T2 | Holly (Ilex Aquifolium) |
TPO 17/99 (a) Missing associated entity |
35 Daws Heath Road, Hadleigh, Benfleet, SS7 3UT | POINT (0.597347 51.569549) | 1999-12-02 | 1999-12-02 |
How to fix this issue
Your dataset is missing the tree-preservation-order column.
The Tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:
tree-preservation-order
The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.
Example: TPO1
How to improve Castle Point Borough Council’s data
- Fix the errors indicated
- Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
- Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL